Saturday, 14 July 2018

Dating or Friend zone?

Thoughts on the Friend Zone and dating?
My wife died last year leaving two children under ten and me. The question on everyone’s lips or minds is “are you going to remain single or get involved with someone new?” Some go so far as to say I “have to” remarry , others say better wait and see, but hardly anyone says that I am better off alone.
A relationship means sex again which is a bit of a drag. If I am honest I would have to say that I was fed up of sex and couldn’t really be bothered with it.
It also means compromise. You can’t do the things you want because the person you are with doesn’t want you to.
Then the things that attract you in the beginning, while dating, almost always become the things that drive you mad later on. The same things you find cute and attractive become annoying and irritating.
Yes there is a magic when falling in love. The infatuation where every moment spent with the other person is bliss, nothing really matters, and they can do no wrong. They annoy you but you don’t mind because you think its funny. This is the best time.
The time before the life’s daily responsibilities choke the fun. You go out together putting everything else aside. You are simply together without worrying about things intervening because you have consciously switched everything else off. Nothing else matters.
There is a tragic beauty in lovers.
Still independent, time spent together, planned or spontaneous, blanks out the noise of reality. If you go to a movie, spend a weekend away, go out for a meal, or watch a movie under a blanket on the sofa it is the most important not because you planned it but because it is.
There is a conscious and subconscious putting aside of everything non conducive to being in love while with each other. You work better, harder, faster, get things so they don’t interrupt.
Then what happens?
The uncertain and spontaneous becomes certain and routine.
We are now a couple which may or may not, in itself, be terminal. Obligations and responsibilities become communal. Finances and practical day to day duties are shared. You can’t put life aside to go and be in love because you’re life is ow with the person you are in love with even during the annoying boring bits of life. If you want to go on a night out alone or with other friends it causes friction. Your whole life is now under scrutiny. Hobbies and personal activities that the other party may not like are either engaged in secretly or after an argument or under a cloud of guilt.
Duties, obligations, and responsibilities begin to pile up and there is no time left for you or love. Things that need doing, boring things like fixing the pipe under the sink or cooking dinner, become things that crowd life out. “I’ll just do this and we will head off somewhere fun later” turns into “I have this, this, this, and that to do and after that I will be exhausted so don’t even mention going out or having fun together. We can do that on the weekend”. Then the weekend gradually fills up and there is no time left.
You know it is all over when, just as you are about to do something that you would put everything aside for , someone says “we can do it tomorrow, or at the weekend” and convinces you to do just one more thing that will solidify your position in this world. Create more safety and security.
Then sex goes. There is no time for it any more and if there is you are too tired or uptight to really enjoy it. There is no longer that clear understanding and harmony between lovers. Frustration and anger creep in.
Things can’t be put off any more. Things that have to be done become the most important part of life. Fulfilling them keeps the other party happy. The spark is gone and it becomes just another humdrum relationship. The infatuation is gone.
Now you are ANNOYING!
Add children to that and what do you get? Two individuals that annoy each other but can’t escape plus one or two or three more individuals that annoy each other and can’t escape = harmony?
Very funny.
What to do? Start a new relationship or live alone, in my case with my children, and be happy living alone?
Living alone seems the simplest.
The fact is I am free . Maybe I should just keep it like that. What is the point in getting all tied up?
Of course there is the positive side. You have someone you can trust without fear they will turn into an axe murderer in the night. Someone who is with you. But are you sure they are? How do you know they, or you, are going to stay the same and won’t turn against you or hurt you? It happens all the time is betrayed.
I am not saying it is not possible to be with someone you trust completely and who would never betray that trust but it takes a long time and a lot of learning and understanding about someone to come to that point. I have people in my life that I trust completely and have had in the past.
What happens if I just want to do nothing, sleep all day, not make any money or spend all my money, move to another country, move to another city, hitch hike across Africa, play in a band, go off and live in a cave, or any number of things? All of these, and many simpler things, become difficult when two have to agree.
What is the benefit?
The companionship. That companionship is full of pressure when what we really want is companionship with another free independent, self sufficent being. Commonly known as a friend. If you want companionship get some friends.
Being in the friend zone is the answer. Don’t have sex with people you want to stay with. If you do have sex don’t move in with people you love. Don’t share money or obligations with people you love / like and want to keep loving / liking and don’t spend time with people who annoy or irritate you even if it seems cute at first (imagine the same annoying actions without the infatuation and honestly consider whether you could live with it).
If you don’t commit to an entangled, demanding, jealous, relationship then you won’t be stuck when it goes bad. Better to commit to an honest, respectful, understanding relationship so if things don’t work out there is no harm.
What about when you already have children? Adding a person is going to cause problems whatever you do. I have personal experience. It is like a huge zit on your behind. It won’t kill you but you can’t sit down.
Perfectly harmonious families with a step parent are the result of hard work. It is human nature to try and arrange our environment the way we want it. Each individual’s pleasure comes first unless they are incredibly selfless and enlightened. Bringing a new person into a relatively worked out situation can work but it needs work.
Can I stay single?
Why do I want to get involved with someone again? Is it just sex? Sex is such a small part of a long term relationship so it can’t be that. Companionship we discussed above (Get some friends!).
Friends with benefits? I never saw that film. Maybe I should or maybe not as I can guess the scenario already. Both parties do what they want when they want, be with who they want when they want but they are best friends with this person and have sex now and then. I personally don’t like the idea as I was never one to engage in gratuitous sense pleasure just for the sake of it and preferred to be in love so that wouldn’t work for me.
As soon as there is sex the whole friendship thing is over. If there is no sex then the friendship thing can last but it lacks the intimacy that we all desire. Why can’t there be pure intimacy without any of the anger, envy and jealousy that always accompanies intimacy.
You are friends with someone and love being with them. They make you laugh and smile. You eat with them, work with them, are open with them, reveal secrets about your personality and life without any fear that they are going to hurt you. Enjoy time laughing, talking, just being.
Something changes after sex. You have made yourself vulnerable. You are both at each other’s mercy. You feel pleasure and intimacy which you want to feel again yet it is not the same as inviting the other person to go for a coffee because it is such a deep part of our physical existence. It complicates things. Only a really free or internally very mature and self realised person can remain the same after getting so close to someone.
The best way to have really strong relationships is to start right from the beginning by being honest about yourself and that way there will be no anger later that you didn’t tell them.
Also make it clear that you are probably not going to change in the future. That you are who you are and that a leopard does not lose its spots. If you haven’t changed for anybody all these years you probably aren’t going to change for them. It is better that the other person realizes that you are who you are and that the faults you have now are going to be there forever. If you like sleeping a lot or your house is messy then you are going to like sleeping a lot and having a messy house 20 years from now. Pretending to be someone you are not just to keep the other person happy is a recipe for disaster because sooner or later you will get tired of pretending.
Of course we want to please people we love and we will change to make people we love happy but that is a choice we make out of love.
People don’t’ actually change for someone else. They just make compomises to get what they want. You may agree to go and see a film you don’t really like just to be with the person you are going with but a time will come when you won’t go and see a film you don’t like with that person because you are with that person enough already.
There are times where you would give up going to something you really want to go to in order to do something but there will come a time when what you want to do, your hobby or whatever will be more important than anything else at that moment. There will be times when you just don’t want to have your own space to do your own thing.
When you give up your own freedom for the so called union of two into one then that is the beginning of the end. There is no point in compromise or change because you have what you want. You have made it. You are now a couple and bound to each other. There are now expectations, promises, debts, duties, etc etc etc. There is nothing to gain from compromise except keeping the relationship going or in other words prolonging the suffering.
It becomes work work work with no payment. Take the kids to school, clean the garden, mow the lawn, make money for the holiday, carry the bags on holiday, go shopping and stand around watching while someone checks all the aisles that you have absolutely no interest in, attend social functions you have no interest in going to and speak to people you really don’t want to speak to just because it is right to do so.
Then there are decisions to make. Where to live. You may want to live in one place but the other person doesn’t. If you are independent you can make decisions based on what is best for you or what you want. But if you are in a relationship you have to make decisions based on what is good for the whole.
If you aren’t a couple is something wrong? Do you really need another person you can rely on, someone you know will care for you if you get ill, someone you know will be there for you in your time of need? Is the price you pay for that really worth paying? Hollywood films would have us believe that it is worth paying. That at the end of life if you have compromised enough and sacrificed enough then you can die happily with all your family around you holding your hand. If it works out like that. Do you need to sacrifice so much to get that? Surely true friends will do that too?
Do you really want to die with a lot of people, who are just there because of a biological or contractual connection, around you?
If you are alone you can go off and die in any old way you want. You can go to the Himalayas, find a cave and meditate. You could go and live in the amazon or out in a forest. You could sit at the door of a temple and hand out flowers to the pilgrims or sit in a coffee shop with friends. There are a million ways you could die. If you don’t have much money you could just find a simple situation with nothing. A partner will usually demand that you don’t give up. Will insist that you have obligations all the way up to the end and that you would be selfish just to go off by yourself to die. You are going to die anyway at some point so to be harassed into dying the way others want you to sounds like perfect hell.
Better not be in a relationship. Better to be free to relate to other free people and enjoy life without caging yourself or others. Better still why don’t we redefine relationship and remove all the built up nasty parts and leave the essence of love and freedom?
I don’t know the answers but lean towards being alone. You don’t have to answer to anyone although you can consult others. People can tell you what to do and you don’t have to do anything to keep them happy.
It would be great to meet someone who didn’t want to complicate things. Who was happy to be with you whenever you were around and you were happy to be with them when they were around? Who was happy to give and take a present here or there or have a coffee together now and then, a meal, a day out, travel, visit places, help each other overcome life’s problems when that help is asked for. A real honest friendship without strings attached. Someone to love as another free person.
Is that possible? Society frowns on it. You are supposed to suffer it seems.
My conclusion, for now, is that the friend zone is the best zone to be in.

Saturday, 3 October 2009

Legislate to control or punish to deter?

Most of us will have heard about the case of the nursery school worker who abused children under her care. I was listening to the radio on the way to University and was shocked at some of the measures proposed eg CCTV cameras in all nurseries, carers being forbidden to take mobile phones to work, even more checks on character and criminal record etc etc etc. The problem is that these measures will affect innocent people more than the guilty. The lady in question will receive, as punishment for her crimes, a short stint in prison, a criminal record and a new identity, courtesy of the taxpayer, after her release. All the multitude of innocent people will receive as punishment for being innocent, a lifetime of restrictions on their freedom! How does that add up?

Look at the case of the two lads who kicked a man to death in the street for no reason other than their drink fueled anger. They received 11 and 13 years. They will be out before they are 30 and can live their lives happily ever after. The rest of us will have to suffer further restrictions on our freedom by being told, if we make the dreadful mistake of going to the supermarket with our underage child, that we can't buy the alcohol we have in our basket or the recent one where a girl was told she couldn't by teaspoons because she was under 25!!!

So every time a crime happens, the government of the day decides to create more restrictions on the freedoms of the innocent in order to avoid the crime happening again. So the end result is that life loses any hint of pleasure and ends up a constant struggle to conform to the myriad of legislation meant to protect stop the guilty causing trouble.

I propose a better solution. Punish the criminals when caught. Put the lady who abused the children behind bars for life, not life sentence out in a few years or a few years sentence suspended, behind bars for life. The two yobs who kicked an innocent man to death? Bring back the death penalty. Execute them. Punish the guilty. Punish them so that other prospective criminals are deterred.

Of course people will cry "Oh but their human rights" and I reply that what does being a human mean? Simply that one is born in a human body? Or does being human entail a certain standard of behaviour below which, if you fall, you lose some of the perks and rights that other humans enjoy? I say that human rights are for those that behave like humans and not for those that don't. I am not saying torture and cause unnecessary pain beyond what is needed and just for the satisfaction of the people administering such punishment. But punish according to the crime.

Stop restricting the freedoms of the innocent in an attempt to catch any criminal before he can act. That has destroyed life for the rest of us. Instead punish the criminals. Life is life. It is so strange that the newspapers don't even have a rudimentary understanding of the English language. They always say "so and so was Jailed for life...." and then add "will serve a minimum of so many years..." In my book "Jailed for life" means just that. The newspapers should say that "so and so was sentenced to a life stigma for his crime but will serve X number of years for it". That would be the correct description of the event.

So how to stop the criminals? Deter them. Punish them. Severely and swiftly. That will deter enough from taking up crime. As it is now a person can murder and be out on the streets in 10 years. While the rest of us have to suffer this incredible intrusion of the state into every aspect of our personal life for the rest of time.

Monday, 7 September 2009

Wierd things on the way Glasgow

I went to Glasgow the other day. I was leaving from "London" Stansted, it took me over two hours to get there even though I live in London. We even have "London" Oxford. If that isn't taking the Mickey then what is? Some poor tourist will find out to his dismay, is that London doesn't always mean London just like Glasgow doesn't always mean Glasgow it sometimes means Prestwick.

Anyway, with time on my hands at the airport, I took a walk. I noticed a sign on top of a hole in the wall, next to the exchange office, "Free Cash" and underneath "Withdrawals". I went to the exchange office and asked the teller how I could get the "Free Cash". He thought it was quite funny.

Then I noticed a sign for a "Male" Toilet?!? I went in but the toilet just looked like any other toilet, it seemed gender neutral. I don't go into the "female" toilets but, urinals aside, I would think they would be the same as the male ones. When did toilets suddenly get a gender? How can you have a male toilet? You have a toilet that men go to but male toilet?

When I was driving back from Glasgow, at about 8pm I noticed one of the overhead illuminated signs said "50 Animals on Road" and underneath "Slow". As hard as I tried I didn't even see one animal let alone 50 and I don't need to be told that animals are slow, of course they are, at best you could expect 1 horsepower.

Thats all folks.

Friday, 4 September 2009

If you don't have enough bad news then why not import some?

The news has become a 24 hour phenomenon. It is almost as if we would all drop dead without it. Or the world would stop spinning, or something terrible. But this constant bombardment with news only began a couple of decades ago at most. Before that people used to read the newspaper, listen to the radio or watch the evening news and for the rest of the day get on with their own lives.

Consider what life would be like, for most of us, if we didn't ingest so much news every day. Take, for example, a person living in a small town somewhere in England (it could be any small town anywhere in the world, but we will consider one in England). Now what happens in small towns? They don't usually have murders every day, nor do they have rapes, nor earthquakes, or wars, or multiple death accidents, political scandals, celebrity scandals, hurricanes etc etc etc. Such events may happen now and then but rarely. When was growing up in a town in Scotland I don't remember anything momentous happening, save for the death of my father in a car accident.

What is my point? It is this, that we make our lives seem terrible simply by importing all the terrible news from all over the world. We just constantly remind ourselves of all the horrible things that are going on every day and by doing that we just get deeper and deeper into a misconception that the whole world is collapsing around us. Well it isn't. Because when we hear of a murder in a small town somewhere that was probably the only murder they had in the last 50 years. But because there is a murder happening every day or every hour or minute somewhere then we get to hear of murders happening constantly and so we think that the whole world has degenerated and is full of murderers, paedophiles, theives, yobs etc etc. It hasn't. 50 years ago we wouldn't have heard of all the crime happening in every single nook and cranny of the world. We would have heard about the crime happening in our town or county and in cases of sensational crimes, in the country and there would have been a serious crime every now and then and the rest of the time life would have been quite peaceful and normal, which it still is now!

The only difference now is that we immerse ourselves in bad news all day every day and wonder why we think the world is hell.

I tried an experiment for the last few weeks. I stopped listening to any news. I found two things happened. One, that life seemed to go on as before even though I didn't know what was going on (supposedly) and two I felt a lot better about my life. I began to see that life is not as bad as the news channels would like us to think it is. That there are good people around me. That good things are happening. That there are simple things in life that reward me with happiness even though a mass murderer went on a rampage in some obscure province in China and that even though I didn't know what was happening in the rest of the world I was still alive and well and, in fact, happier.

The fact of the matter is that we don't need to know most of the stuff we are force fed with grand journalistic sensationalism. We can get on fine without it. So why don't we go back to one or two news bulletins a day read by a guy at a desk without the special effects and then maybe we might notice that there are good things happening around us and the world is not the terrible place it is made out to be.

Saturday, 22 August 2009

Welcome

Hello and welcome to my weblog! I called it "Behind the Scenes" because I believe that there is a lot to learn from what goes on behind the stage presented to us by whoever presents things to us. I know that it has become almost a dirty word to even think about thinking that the present world leaders of society are anything other than altruistic philanthropists whose only concern is the well being of humanity, something like Mother Theresa's morphed into Gordon Brown, Obama, Sarkozy etc etc etc (I am obviously not too up to date on my political leaders as those are the only ones that come to mind at the moment, Oh! Mandeslson, how could I forget him?). But I am unwilling to accept that idea. This blog is just a forum to vent my thoughts about the world today. Maybe nobody will read them, maybe someone will, maybe those who do will think they are the senseless ravings of a lunatic, but when I do write I write from the heart. If you have any questions or comments feel free to send them to me. I am new to blogging so I don't know how it works, but if there is a possibility to post ideas sent in to me (with permission) then I am happy to do that. Anyway, enough welcoming, now I just have to find the time to write something. Hope to see you all soon, via my writing.

Vij